On the same day, the federal agents The test was conducted at Jeffrey Clark’s North Virginia homeA former judicial official who considered Trump appointing the department because Trump was willing to pursue a plan to declare election results invalid in some key states.
Both Clark and Eastman played a key role in Trump’s efforts in late 2020 and early 2021 to replace state legislators in about half a dozen states with Biden’s winning voters. In theory, such an alternative would keep Trump in the White House.
Monday’s court filings also show that the Inspector General of the Judiciary has become a veteran of criminal investigations surrounding January 6, because Eastman says his phone was taken by FBI agents acting on behalf of the Inspector General. A spokesman for the Inspector General declined to comment. Burham did not immediately respond to an email seeking further information on the seizure.
The Inspector General is an independent body working to differentiate waste, fraud and abuse in the judiciary. IG investigations examine the conduct of current or former departmental officials, and suggest that the role of the office in this case may be to review the contents of Eastman’s phone as part of a criminal investigation into the clerk or others who worked in that field.
In court documents, Eastman argues that he should withdraw his phone because he was never a judicial employee and he was “beyond the jurisdiction of the OIG”.
When Eastman was told to look at the warrant, the court documents show that the request was rejected. He was examined, his iPhone was taken from him, and the file states that he was forced to provide biometric data to unlock the phone.
That claim could turn out to be controversial because the warrant for his phone explicitly states that he may be asked to provide a password or biometric data at will, but cannot be compelled to provide that information.
The warrant also states that federal prosecutors are prepared to take legal action over the phone’s contents, as it stipulates that its contents will not be viewed immediately by the commission of inquiry.
In his own document, Eastman wrote, “There are emails on his phone that have been the subject of intense, five-month privilege controversy. [himself] And a select committee of the US House of Representatives to investigate the January 6 attack on the US capital. ” The lawsuit alleges that a federal judge in California previously ruled that some of Eastman’s emails were “protected by First Amendment union liberty, attorney-client privilege, and / or job-creation doctrine.”
Prior to January 6, Eastman’s role and its aftermath were the main focus of the group. The trial is scheduled for Tuesday afternoon With an as yet unannounced witness or witnesses.
Despite an angry mob looting US capital and trying to prevent lawmakers from counting the election votes that made Biden president, Eastman continued to argue his case for reversing the election results, according to an email exchange that day. After Benz was expelled from the Senate for his own protection, Benz’s aide, Greg Jacob, sent a furious email to Eastman.
According to Eastman, Jacob wrote, “Thanks for your bull —-, we are now besieged.”
Eastman wrote in response to Jacob, “What you do in Capitol is that you and your employer did not do what was necessary to allow this to air in the public domain, so that the American people can see for themselves what happened.” Trump’s allegations of voter fraud.
Pence, who presided over the Senate, emailed Eastman as he was in custody with Jacob and other advisers in the safe area. The rebels were tearing up the Capitol compound, and some of them called for Pence to be hanged.
After Jan. 6, Eastman wrote in an email to former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani that the Jan. 6 Committee had revealed that “I have decided that if it is still in effect, it should be on the apology list.” The panel aired the testimonies of other witnesses At least five Republican members of Congress have apologized From the President in the days when his presidency was declining. None of them were pardoned or charged.
“Lifelong social media lover. Falls down a lot. Creator. Devoted food aficionado. Explorer. Typical troublemaker.”