During the build up to this event, every man
and his dog gave their opinion concerning the outcome of this first super
fight in the middleweight division since Hagler-Leonard. I was no different,
except for one key ingredient. I picked the winner and the round in which the
fight would end, so I'm going to bask in a little glory of my own knowing that
my pre-fight analysis has not left me with egg on my face.
I must admit that the fight was not fought in the fashion I was expecting, I
think that was the case for most observers. The fight certainly did not live
up to expectations of spectacular entertainment, but at least it did not turn
into a boring snooze fest either, so I am grateful. I really expected to see
Hopkins set a furious pace, similar to what we saw against William Joppy,
mixed with some skilled boxing as we saw Bernard utilize against Trinidad.
Instead we saw the older and ALLEGEDLY slower
man with the inferior boxing skills (according to many boxing experts and
commentators) out speed, out jab and totally outclass Oscar De la Hoya.
After a very dull first round Hopkins starts to find range with his jab and
the occasional leading left hook and some very fast long range lead right
hands. Oscar landed only a handful of solid punches the entire bout, a few
light jabs, one grazing right hand and a few good body punches. The punch that
remotely had any effect on Hopkins was a low blow not seen by Kenny Bayless.
The reason Oscar did not land many punches was
due to Hopkins' very effective head & lateral movement and also his glove
positioning was close to perfect. Bernard was evading or blocking most of what
De la Hoya fired in his direction.
I do believe that Hopkins, like Marvelous
Marvin Hagler before him, played with fire in the early rounds by being too
cautious, not throwing enough punches and trying to out box De la Hoya. From
my perspective (and Bernard's I would assume) Hopkins was easily out boxing De
la Hoya and always in control of the fight.
At the time of stoppage, I had Bernard winning
6 out of the 8 completed rounds. But my or anyone else's opinion counts for
very little on the judges scorecards so it did not surprise me when I heard on
the Australian telecast that one judge had Oscar ahead on points. I was
disappointed that a trained judge could have De a Hoya ahead; luckily Bernard
took the decision out of the judges hands and saved boxing from suffering
another potential black eye.
Being a fan of Bernard Hopkins, I felt he was not working hard enough to take
the early rounds decisively. It may have been obvious to me that Hopkins was
landing the cleaner and heavier punches. I think Oscar did achieve some
success in stealing a few close rounds on the scorecards as the judges must
have scored some punches that hit Bernard's gloves and they must have scored
some punches that did not land at all.
From the 7th round onwards Bernard stated to pick up the pace slightly, having
a clear effect on Oscar. I sensed Hopkins had plenty left in the tank. I was
also surprised that Bernard had barely thrown any body punches, was it one of
his tactics to make Oscar think he was targeting that million dollar face for
a spectacular KO and lull him to sleep and not protect his body? (Bernard said
not so in a recent interview).
Oscar showed us all those impressive abdominal
muscles quite a few times during the build up to this fight, it's unfortunate
for him that this conditioning couldn't help his ribcage withstand Bernard's
crushing shot to the liver.
During the week leading up to this bout I became frustrated with boxing
commentators and respected boxing journalists' perception that De la Hoya
was the better schooled boxer and in possession of superior speed. I felt De
la Hoya would have problems with Hopkins' speed and boxing skills. How sweet
it was to see what I envisaged happening come to reality. Something to think
about for people who think speed is everything, IT IS NOT! Speed kills if used
correctly and wisely. Oscar may be faster (slightly, perhaps) with his flashy
flurries of punches. However, these visually impressive combinations mainly
hit thin air or gloves and they certainly were not enough to phase a skilled
opponent like Bernard Hopkins.
These tactics may have worked previously for
Oscar when facing smaller and/or less skilled opponents, against who he had
less to fear as far as punches being sent back in his direction, and I'm
certainly not forgetting that under that pretty face is a very sturdy chin.
Bernard, on the other hand, threw fast and accurate single punches that found
their target through good planning and technique, not by throwing a bunch of
punches and hoping for the best.
For the first time in his career Oscar De la Hoya faced an opponent who was
not only physically larger than himself, but he was facing an opponent who was
in possession of substantially superior skills than himself and also
comparable speed. Don't get caught up in the hype that De la Hoya only lost
because he fought a bigger man, that's only half the reason. Under rated speed
used in superior fashion and a better skill level won this fight for Hopkins.
Everyone knew leading up to this bout that both men had good chins, I said
that if De la Hoya hit Hopkins it would just make Bernard come on stronger as
it was unlikely Oscar had the power to hurt him. Oscar, whilst in possession
of a good chin does not like getting hit and when he has been hit hard in
previous bouts it has upset his rhythm and mindset. This was evident when
Hopkins landed those four lead straight right hands in round 4.
Readers of my pre-fight analysis of this bout know I'm not much of a De la
Hoya fan, but I will give him credit where it is due. He did not run and turn
this event into a disgracefully boring farce. He came in determined an
confident he would win. He also took the bout up to the bigger, stronger
champion and gave Hopkins more difficulties than I expected.
Oscar did not quit; it was evident to me that
the single body shot he took everything out of him, rendering him unable to
recover before the 10 count. I can empathize with the pain he was in, I've
been there in my own training and could relate to his. I gained some new found
respect for the Golden Boy when he banged his gloves on the canvas as the pain
of the loss came to reality. When De la Hoya rose, he even tarnished his
golden boy image by saying "Fire Truck," such was his disappointment and
frustration.
In my eyes De la Hoya has become more human and
less perfect, so I guess that's not such a bad thing. It's good for these
fighters who have handed out so many
devastating KO's to be on the receiving end for a change. In most cases
it will make them a better person and I'm sure this type of loss will give
Oscar a whole new perspective of the sport.
As for Hopkins, he wants Roy Jones Jnr. or Antonio Tarver, or so he says. It
may be tough to get Jones in the ring; he may still demand unrealistic amounts
of money and Tarver has been ordered by the WBC to face Paul Briggs, their #1
contender, next. Here is a very interesting and VERY biased concept, perhaps
Tarver could defend his title against Briggs and Hopkins could make his 20th
title defense against Sam Soliman on the same card. Wishful thinking on my
part to see two Aussies fighting for world titles against two of the world's
best fighters. I can dream...
My educated guess is we will see Bernard
Hopkins face Howard Eastman in a WBC mandatory title defense. Does the
prospect of Hopkins facing either Eastman or Soliman next, sound boring? The
fact of the matter is that both men would probably give Hopkins a harder bout
than De la Hoya or Trinidad and both would probably see out the full 12
rounds.