|




-Photo Credit: Tom Casino/Showtime-
In a return battle between established bantam-super bantam
special ones Rafael Marquez and Israel Vasquez, it was no
surprise this one would equal the first barn burner.
My question, other than by popular demand, why now -
especially with other shareholders of some esteem in (WBA)
Caballero, (IBF) Molitor, (WBO) Ponce de Leon waiting in the
wings to be had - then, maybe a Marquez-Vazquez return would
make better sense - and mucho more dinero.
Whatever, with memories of the first battle for Vazquez’ WBC
strap fresh in the mind of fan and media alike, and both
gladiators nearing the inevitable count down after a
collective 85 kept appointments with 64 by stoppage, the
mindset shouted "pronto."
On that note, only the Marquez betting and rooting interest
would be disappointed when referee Guadeloupe Garcia, halted
the mutual bloodletting at the 1:16 seconds mark of stanza
six.
The fight: Opens on similar note to the first one - Marquez
the edge on accuracy and Vazquez countering with solid left
hooks - then stanza three and a Vazquez left hook early on
has the champ in trouble and on shaky legs - still, a game
Marquez survives and is back in the hunt come the bell.
Five completed chapters on my unofficial had it a nip-n-tuck
Marquez edge of 3-2 in rounds and 48-47 in points - and
severe cuts over the Vazquez eyes carried the feel of a
Marquez de-ja-vu repeat of the first one - only missing
entity was Vazquez not having scored a knockdown.
Then numero six - it’s early in the round and both wearing
the marks of battle, Vazquez cut over both eyes and Marquez
bleeding below right - and then like a bolt from the blue
Marquez is down courtesy of the power hook - beats the count
but in trouble with Vazquez driving his prey to the ropes.
Marquez attempts in vain to return fire, but to no avail -
with the legs gone AWOL and little left in the way of fire
power, the plug would be pulled by referee Garcia.
Post Scripts: Israel Vazquez (42-4, 32) ~ age 29 -
surprisingly, considering the sizzling early exchanges
compounded by damaged orbits, the legs showed spring and
life that it did. Deserves couple curtain calls - also more
than the five month rehab after that first Marquez
encounter.
Rafael Marquez ( 37-4, 33) ~ age 32
- would be wrong in assuming this special one has aged
overnight - the two brutal battles were the villain in both
outings. Vazquez busted beak in the first classic - the
wicked stamina sapping pace in this one saw the Marquez legs
eventually abandoning him.
Closing comments: Hold the music maestro … the clowns will
suffice. Enter Jimmy "the jerk" Gray a proven failure in the
lost art of fight interviewing. Beckons both fighters for
the usual self-serving ludicrous questions-answers silliness
- then realizes he had outpaced the Spanish speaking
interpreter - nice move dummy. Nothing like advertising lack
of feel for the job - also, total inconsideration for the
fighters, both more in need of suturing than in hyping a
tie-breaker for the Network and promoters. The fight stands
on its merits alone.
Albert-Bernstein: Ah, yes
… Bernstein of "you cannot beat a southpaw unless having the
left foot outside his right foot" infamy seems to be taking
on the look of that other hysterian Maxie boy of ESPN2 to
HBO infamy. Heard Al mention at time of referee Garcia no
mas, something about in all his years, rarely criticizing
referee stoppages - but saw this one premature. Surprise -
sees the replay and does instant U-turn. Less said about
company man Albert the better - clearly not the best of
Albert clan.
Post Scripts: Considering the numbers of fights and
respective ages of Marquez and Vazquez I think a third
encounter could well be career finale for one or both. For
Vazquez, the younger of the two, the smart move is going the
unify route - a better choice than the already in motion
tie-breaker - surely designed for PPV. Ditto Marquez, at age
32, once again healed a challenge to any of the other
current shareholders a better selection than Vazquez where
nobody really wins other than the networks, promoters, and
bettors lucky enough to have the winner.
GEL - 8-4-2007 |