I recently saw a replay of
the famous Roberto Duran - Ken Buchanan battle of
1972. It was the June night in which Roberto lifted
Ken's lightweight title and started a reign of
terror in the lightweight division that lasted
until 1978. Although Duran was winning, the
controversial end in the thirteenth round of the
Buchanan fight should have warranted a return match
for Ken. The Buchanan camp said he was hit low
at the end of the thirteenth round and could not
continue. Referee Johnny Lo Bianco thought otherwise
and stopped the bout.
Duran's ferocious aggression had surprised the slick boxing Buchanan
throughout the fight. Still at times Ken showed
tremendous grit and held his own. After
this bout Buchanan would more then earn his right to a
rematch. He won thirteen straight bouts going into
1975. In fact his first fight back he
halted former champion Carlos Ortiz.
Two fights later Ken outscored future lightweight champion Jim Watt.
The wins kept coming. Among his victims were Hector
Matta, ChuChu Malave and Frankie Otero on
two occasions. He stopped Antonio Puddu to win the
European title. Still no rematch with Duran.
Finally Ken secured a match with WBC lightweight champion Ishimatsu
" Guts" Suzuki in Tokyo. Suzuki had lost title
attempts against Ismael Laguna and Duran but then
knocked out Rodolfo Gonzalez to gain recognition from
the WBC. Many gave Ken a very good chance of winning
this fight but the ever aggressive Suzuki pulled out a
unanimous decision and Ken's hopes of getting Roberto
back in the ring ended. Later Suzuki would lose his
title to Esteban De Jesus. Duran had lost the only
fight of his career to De Jesus in a non title fight
just months after he had beaten Buchanan. Two years
later Duran stopped De Jesus in a title fight. When De
Jesus beat Suzuki it eventually set up the unification
rubber match in which Roberto again halted Esteban.
Why would Roberto never grant Buchanan a return match? Ken was a top
contender for almost three years. Would Buchanan and
De Jesus have met if Ken would have defeated Suzuki?
If so, who would have won that fight? Buchanan
had his most trouble with hard charging, aggressive
fighters like Duran and Suzuki. De Jesus was
more of a boxer/counter puncher. Buchanan would
have had a better chance of establishing his fine jab
thus giving him a decent chance of beating De
Jesus. I think it would have been a great fight.
I think Duran - Buchanan II would have been great too.
Too bad we'll never know.
Jim Amato
6-24-2006